The 30-year
effort to rid the sports landscape of Native American nicknames and
mascots has never been easy. Now, the task has been made even more
difficult by the unlikeliest group of all - Native Americans.
A nationwide poll that surveyed a cross-section of sports fans
and Indians in general has revealed a startling finding:
The majority of American Indians polled have no problem with the
use of Indian nicknames and symbols and said professional teams
shouldn't stop using them.
Further, most Native Americans surveyed didn't even object to the
Washington football team's name, Redskins, a moniker many regard as
a racial slur.
The poll, commissioned by Sports Illustrated and published in its
March 4 edition, was conducted by the Peter Harris Research Group,
which interviewed Native Americans living on and off reservations as
well as non-Indian fans. Responses were weighted according to U.S.
census figures for age, race and gender.
In other words, this wasn't some high school class project, nor
one of those surveys deliberately skewed to achieve desired
findings. Attacking the messengers - and their methodology - would
be futile for anti-nickname activists, who have been dealt a large
blow.
For years, the campaign against Indian nicknames and mascots has
presumed their usages offend Indians. But according to the poll, the
consensus falls in the opposite direction:
- 83 percent of Indians, and 79 percent of fans, said pro teams
should not stop using Indian nicknames, mascots and symbols.
- 75 percent of Indians, and 88 percent of fans, said use of the
names and symbols does not contribute to discrimination against
Indians.
- Asked if high school and college teams should stop using
Indian nicknames, 81 percent of Native American respondents said
no.
If anything, the poll reveals the vast disconnect on
this issue between Native American activists and the general Native
American population. It would seem that anti-nickname forces now
face an untenable predicament: Mock the research or mock Native
Americans for their perceived unenlightenment.
The latter has already happened, with Native American activist
Suzan Harjo dismissing the majority's opinion by telling the
magazine, ``There are happy campers on every plantation.''
This, of course, is stereotyping in itself - the implication that
most Native Americans simply don't possess the self-esteem and
smarts required to be insulted by teams naming themselves after
indigenous peoples.
Then again, infighting on this complex issue is nothing new.
Though more than 600 schools and minor league teams since 1969 have
dropped Indian nicknames some deem offensive, they not only persist
but, in some instances, have been sanctioned by Native Americans.
Florida State University uses the name Seminoles for its teams
with the approval of the Seminole nation. And several years ago, the
University of Utah offered to drop the nickname Running Utes, and
its eagle-feathers-and-drum logo, if the tribe found them
objectionable. It did not, provided that they be used in a positive
manner.
That last point goes the crux of the issue. Names and symbols per
se are usually not the problem. It's the attendant behavior by fans,
and the cartoonish antics of mascots, that Native Americans have
rightly found objectionable.
But even on that point, there is anything but mass disapproval.
Asked what they thought of the tomahawk chop arm motion performed
by fans at Atlanta Braves games, 23 percent of Indians polled found
it objectionable, while 48 percent didn't care and 28 percent said
they liked it.